Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Obama don't need no steenkin' binders

I'd call it a double dip when a Republican presidential candidate manages to combine a gaffe with a lie. Seriously folks, give the guy some credit...that's not necessarily an easy thing to pull off.

In light of this accomplishment, I decided it was time to repost some pictures I put up a while ago demonstrating that President Obama don't need no steenkin' binders.

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket
Posted by at

4 comments:

  1. Beautiful pictures. Makes you proud to be an American.

    ReplyDelete

  2. Men who invest heavily in patriarchy are afraid of women and insecure about themselves. I know I'm not saying anything we don't already know. But one thing we know about Obama is that he is not insecure about himself as a man. He values intelligent and strong women. He married one and is raising two.

    This will be the first time I have gone here, but this is one place where it strikes me as legitimate to raise theological issues regarding Romney. I'm not suggesting all Mormons are heavily invested in patriarchy, but I would say that the theology and custom of the church are deeply patriarchal and even misogynistic, and people who buy into the institutional hierarchy of the Mormon church, as Romney has, are buying into that kind of sentiment. I've known too many Mormon women personally who dealt with this to give anyone a pass.

    No man who is secure in his manhood needs to overturn the Lilly Ledbetter Act.

    ReplyDelete

  3. Romney's what I call an anachronism(always wanted to use that one). It's like he stopped growing after 1955. Binders? Who are these female supporters of his? I can't wait for him and Mrs Stepford to go home. I'll enjoy the humiliation for now.

    Vic78

    ReplyDelete

  4. Fabulous; thank you so much.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)