tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7163441833245663827.post183091445538307238..comments2024-03-28T10:49:14.510-05:00Comments on Horizons: What Michael Brown's preliminary autopsy does/doesn't tell usNancy LeTourneauhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12614317154146836694noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7163441833245663827.post-88088689866768905512014-08-18T09:00:40.941-05:002014-08-18T09:00:40.941-05:00Hi Nancy, I just found your blog through a link so...Hi Nancy, I just found your blog through a link someone sent me. I love what you have to say here, and I'm adding it to my blogroll. Looking forward to reading more.<br /><br />The Ferguson shooting is still such a mystery, and now we have the autopsy. I thought when I saw the bullet entries that the one at the top of Michael Brown's head showed that he was falling to the ground when he was shot again. It looks like he was shot in or above his eye, which would have been the one that might make him finally fall.<br /><br />I don't understand why the police aren't trained to shoot (if shooting is absolutely required) in the legs or arms. It would stop them without killing them. But the fact that the officer shot him six times is stunning. He shot from a distance. He wasn't in any danger from Brown. Six times. Why? Reflex, maybe, but their training should knock that out of them. They're not amateurs. <br /><br />RamonaRamona Grigghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07160614050077886238noreply@blogger.com