[From the 2020 census,]Texas gained the most black people, nearly 700,000, of any state in the country. Georgia and Florida were second and third place, increasing their black populations by 450,000 and 390,000, respectively. All three states were governed by Republican governors with Republican-run legislatures throughout the decade. Texas saw its black population grow by 23% while Georgia and Florida saw 15% and 13% growth respectively...
In short, if you were a person of color in the United States over the past decade, especially a black person, looking to move or have children, the GOP-run states of Texas, Florida, and Georgia were the most attractive places to live.
Surely this suggests that conservative Republican governance creates desirable conditions for nonwhite Americans.
The first thing Carney should know is that, in the first census after the Civil War, Blacks were less than two percentage points away from constituting a majority in Florida and just under four in Georgia. At the time, 90% of African Americans lived in Southern states. Then came the terror campaign by groups like the KKK, resulting in the Great Migration. Six million African Americans fled to urban areas in Northern and Western states. By 1970, nearly half of all African Americans lived in Northern cities.
At the beginning of the 21st century, organizations like the Brookings Institute began chronicling the New Great Migration, in which Black people were moving back to the South. As they explained, one of the primary destinations was the state of Georgia. The 2010 census confirmed that the New Great Migration was well underway.
The percentage of the nation’s black population living in the South has hit its highest point in half a century, according to census data released Thursday, as younger and more educated black residents move out of declining cities in the Northeast and Midwest...
The share of black population growth that has occurred in the South over the past decade — the highest since 1910, before the Great Migration of blacks to the North — has upended some long-held assumptions...
Atlanta, for the first time, has replaced Chicago as the metro area with the largest number of African-Americans after New York.
We can all speculate about the reasons Black people are moving back to the South. For some, it is in search of greater economic opportunity. But there are other factors as well. William Frey, who has documented the movement, pointed to "tradition" and "cultural ties." Millions of Great Migration participants left behind aunts, uncles, grandparents and cousins. "It will always have the sense of ancestral history," Isabel Wilkerson, author of The Warmth of Other Suns, said.
Here is what Charles Blow wrote about African Americans in the South heading into the 2020 Democratic primary:
According to researchers at the Brookings Institution, there are 1,200 majority-black towns and cities in America, about 1,000 of which are in the South. And the number of majority-black cities is on the rise.Blow pointed that out to make the point that Black people in the South have recently been gaining power in municipal politics.
In addition, almost all of the largest cities in the Deep South, as I have defined it, are majority-black with a black mayor.
Speaking of the South more broadly, every one of the top 10 states with the highest percent of black population is in the South.
Those voters may be less excited by a national revolution because they are living through a very real revolution on the ground. They are feeling their power in cities and increasingly in statewide races.
Simply put, my proposition was this: that Black people reverse the Great Migration — the mass migration of millions of African-Americans largely from the rural South to cities primarily in the North and West that spanned from 1916 to 1970. That they return to the states where they had been at or near the majority after the Civil War, and to the states where Black people currently constitute large percentages of the population. In effect, Black people could colonize the states they would have controlled if they had not fled them.
While Carney wants you to believe that African Americans have been attracted to Georgia by GOP governance, that's not exactly what's happening.
In November, Georgia voted blue for the first time since Bill Clinton won the state in 1992. A majority of those who voted for Joe Biden were Black. This week, Georgia elected its first Black senator in state history — indeed the first popularly elected Democratic Black senator from the whole South: Raphael Warnock, a pastor at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, where Martin Luther King Jr. once preached. Georgia also elected its first Jewish senator — only the second from the South since the 1880s: Jon Ossoff.
Perhaps most striking, the Warnock win was the first time in American history that a Black senator was popularly elected by a majority-Black coalition. It was a momentous flex of Black power.
So Carney is totally ignorant about what is going on in states like Georgia (or at least he assumes that his readers are ignorant). That is the price people pay for living in a white supremacist bubble. As Black power in the South continues to flex, it is going to totally catch them off guard. It kind of reminds me of this surfer:
Terrific report. As a telling coincidence, the same day the NY Times ran an obit on the popular author of a book debunking bad history in textbooks, not because he had a political agenda, but because he was a teacher himself and appalled. The one described in the obit was about rosy views of southern whites as having taken things back from the vile state of affairs in Reconstruction, when (the story goes) blacks governed, badly, and had to be rescued by the benevolent whites from themselves.
ReplyDeleteNot that those eating up complaints about critical race theory need always do so to preserve the good old biases. They may simply love being victims and love having a liberal, educated enemy. But it can boil down to much the same thing.
The other half of the post, about black gains, has me less sanguine and thinking only "let's hope." Bloggers have promised demographic gains for so long now, particularly in Texas, which right now with voting rights and Covid is striving for the prize of most hateful state in the union (a tough contest given Covid rates in Louisiana and Alabama and the Florda governor's similar policies). Besides, even should things change, we'll still be up against the usual gaming of the system: gerrymanders, the Senate and the electoral college's favoring of less populated states, GOP funding advantage, GOP safe havens in think tanks, the propaganda machine in right-wing media, and the compliant mainstream media.
Fine as Charles Blow is, and praiseworthy as his choice to move may be as well, it comes off as a fantasy as well. It is an act of privileged, when most people live precisely where they can afford to and can get a job. Even if enough others had a choice, how many people choose their home for maximum impact at the polls? Seriously! If jobs and housing aren't the sole constraint, surely many more live where they know it minimizes their impact, because they seek cultural opportunities and a lifestyle that place them among others like themselves politically as well. Should we decry that? Even if I could afford to leave NYC, I wouldn't be going anytime soon.