Monday, June 8, 2015

"The Character of Our Country"

Tomorrow President Obama is going to give a speech about health care in America. In preparation for that, he wrote a post on the White House blog recalling a letter the late Sen. Ted Kennedy wrote to him after he learned that his illness was terminal.

It reminded me of the first time President Obama mentioned that letter publicly. It was in a speech he gave to a joint session of Congress about the need for health care reform on September 9, 2009. Speaking about the letter from Sen. Kennedy he said:
In it, he...expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform -- "that great unfinished business of our society," he called it -- would finally pass. He repeated the truth that health care is decisive for our future prosperity, but he also reminded me that "it concerns more than material things." "What we face," he wrote, "is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country."

I've thought about that phrase quite a bit in recent days -- the character of our country...

On issues like these, Ted Kennedy's passion was born not of some rigid ideology, but of his own experience. It was the experience of having two children stricken with cancer. He never forgot the sheer terror and helplessness that any parent feels when a child is badly sick. And he was able to imagine what it must be like for those without insurance, what it would be like to have to say to a wife or a child or an aging parent, there is something that could make you better, but I just can't afford it.

That large-heartedness -- that concern and regard for the plight of others -- is not a partisan feeling. It's not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character -- our ability to stand in other people's shoes; a recognition that we are all in this together, and when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand; a belief that in this country, hard work and responsibility should be rewarded by some measure of security and fair play; and an acknowledgment that sometimes government has to step in to help deliver on that promise...

You see, our predecessors understood that government could not, and should not, solve every problem. They understood that there are instances when the gains in security from government action are not worth the added constraints on our freedom. But they also understood that the danger of too much government is matched by the perils of too little; that without the leavening hand of wise policy, markets can crash, monopolies can stifle competition, the vulnerable can be exploited.

And they knew that when any government measure, no matter how carefully crafted or beneficial, is subject to scorn; when any efforts to help people in need are attacked as un-American; when facts and reason are thrown overboard and only timidity passes for wisdom, and we can no longer even engage in a civil conversation with each other over the things that truly matter -- that at that point we don't merely lose our capacity to solve big challenges. We lose something essential about ourselves.
This is the quintessential message President Obama has been repeating for over six years now. It actually goes back longer than that - to his 2004 speech at the Democratic Convention. Beneath all the political arguments about shrinking or streamlining government are two moral questions. First of all, it is about the role of empathy in our attitudes towards one another - or as he said it here - our "concern and regard for the plight of others." And secondly, it's about our ability to engage in a "civil conversation with each other over the things that truly matter."

The President spoke to the same underlying moral questions as they apply to the larger issues of war and peace in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech. After discussing the various institutional issues that promote peace, he said this:
I do not believe that we will have the will, the determination, the staying power, to complete this work without something more -- and that's the continued expansion of our moral imagination; an insistence that there's something irreducible that we all share.

As the world grows smaller, you might think it would be easier for human beings to recognize how similar we are; to understand that we're all basically seeking the same things; that we all hope for the chance to live out our lives with some measure of happiness and fulfillment for ourselves and our families.
Is it any wonder that I see the connection between the words of Bobby Kennedy, the life's work of Ted Kennedy and the central message of this President?
But we can perhaps remember - even if only for a time - that those who live with us are our brothers, that they share with us the same short movement of life, that they seek - as we do - nothing but the chance to live out their lives in purpose and happiness, winning what satisfaction and fulfillment they can.

Surely this bond of common faith, this bond of common goal, can begin to teach us something. Surely we can learn, at least, to look at those around us as fellow men and surely we can begin to work a little harder to bind up the wounds among us and to become in our hearts brothers and countrymen once again.

Robert F. Kennedy
That is ultimately still the question at stake when it comes to the character of our country.

1 comment:

  1. A Governmental Budget is a MORAL Statement of that government's Priorities!

    On a side note, you really killed em at Washington Monthly. BRAVO!