Living through the election and presidency of Donald Trump changed my perspective in some important ways. The one that feels the most obvious is that I used to believe that when it became clear that Republican policies were a failure, voters would wake up and recognize what had gone wrong.
Based on the 2008 election, I had reason to believe that was true. After Bush/Cheney completely botched the response to Katrina, lied to get us mired in an endless war in the Middle East, and implemented policies that brought on the Great Recession, voters actually elected this country's first African American president who promised "hope and change."
But I failed to envision that someone like Trump could come along and exploit the racism those eight years unleashed. As Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote:
Replacing Obama is not enough—Trump has made the negation of Obama’s legacy the foundation of his own. And this too is whiteness. “Race is an idea, not a fact,” the historian Nell Irvin Painter has written, and essential to the construct of a “white race” is the idea of not being a nigger. Before Barack Obama, niggers could be manufactured out of Sister Souljahs, Willie Hortons, and Dusky Sallys. But Donald Trump arrived in the wake of something more potent—an entire nigger presidency with nigger health care, nigger climate accords, and nigger justice reform, all of which could be targeted for destruction or redemption, thus reifying the idea of being white. Trump truly is something new—the first president whose entire political existence hinges on the fact of a black president. And so it will not suffice to say that Trump is a white man like all the others who rose to become president. He must be called by his rightful honorific—America’s first white president.
Over the course of Trump's presidency, he told more than 30,000 lies. Face-checkers were so busy they could hardly keep up. With the spread of a global pandemic, those lies became deadly.
Here is where Barack Obama and the civil rights leaders of old are joined -- in a shocking, almost certifiable faith in humanity, something that subsequent generations lost. The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. may have led African Americans out of segregation, and he may have cured incalculable numbers of white racists, but more than all that, he believed that the lion's share of the population of this country would not support the rights of thugs to pummel people who just wanted to cross a bridge. King believed in white people, and when I was a younger, more callow man, that belief made me suck my teeth. I saw it as weakness and cowardice, a lack of faith in his own. But it was the opposite. King's belief in white people was the ultimate show of strength: He was willing to give his life on a bet that they were no different from the people who lived next door.
That makes me wonder what Rev. King would say today. Certainly the obstacles he faced were much more severe. But we've watched thugs pummel people who simply wanted to protect the Capitol. Trump and his supporters just cheered them on.
I truly have no idea where all of this will lead. But perhaps the hardest thing for me to grapple with these days is that my faith in humanity is being challenged. That one goes to the core because cynicism has never been an option for me.
You're an optimist by nature, so I appreciate your sharing that. It resonates with my own despair. I wish I had an answer, other than to find hope in just how aberrant the result in 2016 was. Clinton could easily or even almost certainly have won, Trump with Fox support and compliant mainstream media wouldn't have had all this time to build the unreality, and we'd have made the transition toward a liberal court and, almost certainly, a stronger Obamacase and a more forceful early response to economic setbacks and the virus. Would that have headed off the worst, and can it conceivably ever come out that way again? I just don't know.
ReplyDeleteNancy, I've always read your work for its inherent faith in humanity, in its expectation that 'better angels' will win out. Yet, I'm becoming more dissuaded as are you that my fellow Americans can see their ways out of this mess of R lies and corruption. Let me recommend a book I'm currently reading, 'Hiding in Plain Sight' by Sarah Kendzior, who has also written 'The View from Flyover Country' which is her analysis of the very state where both she and I live. Kendzior looks at the census records from 2000 to 2010 and into 2020 (which are not yet completely available), and she recognizes that the population shifts have moved whites apart from non-whites to a greater degree than many of us expected. She suggests that this is not only a social statement, but one which reflects the alterations in economy, postulating that those who now 'have'a bit are deathly afraid of losing it to the current poor population, especially if that population is non-white. It's a convenient excuse, but one which is likely couched in the fears of economic desperation. I look for the days (hopefully soon) when the Democrats start shouting long and loud about the Biden economic plans and the success they are already bringing, but more about the potential for future successes. If anything, those who have lost their way have lost their faith in the present and have given over to their fears of the future, exactly the tramp gameplay: divide, instill incredible fear even if it is not logical, and then continue to hammer away at everything that can lead to improvement. Do they support vaccinations? mask-wearing? social distancing? Not in MO, evidently, where the AG is simply using these key elements of pandemic controls to further his own political ambitions.
ReplyDeleteIt's hard to tell how the future will play out, but one thing that gives me long term optimism is that according to CNN exit polls, Trump lost by about 14 points among voters under age 45 in both 2016 and 2020. In 2020, Biden won the age 18-24 demographic 65% to 31%. That suggests that the current situation is temporary. If we remain a democracy, we are headed towards a future in which someone like Donald Trump won't have a realistic chance of becoming President.
ReplyDelete