For us to be able to get the basic architecture in place with aggressive-enough targets from the major emitters that the smaller countries say, "This is serious" — that will be a success.Here's how Goodell summarized his take on that at the end of the article:
I'm less concerned about the precise number, because let's stipulate right now, whatever various country targets are, it's still going to fall short of what the science requires. So a percent here or a percent there coming from various countries is not going to be a deal-breaker. But making sure everybody is making serious efforts and that we are making a joint international commitment that is well-defined and can be measured will create the basis for us each year, then, to evaluate, "How are we doing?" and will allow us, five years from now, to say the science is new, we need to ratchet it up, and by the way, because of the research and development that we've put in, we can achieve more ambitious goals...
And the key for Paris is just to make sure that everybody is locked in, saying, "We're going to do this." Once we get to that point, then we can turn the dials. But there will be a momentum that is built, and I'm confident that we will then be in a position to listen more carefully to the science — partly because people, I think, will be not as fearful of the consequences or as cynical about what can be achieved. Hope builds on itself. Success breeds success.
The two biggest take-aways from my time with the president were these: First, he is laser-focused on the Paris climate talks and is playing a multidimensional chess game with other nations to build alliances and cut deals to reach a meaningful agreement later this year. Second, whatever deals he cuts, it won't be enough...This is a long war, with everything at stake. "I do what I can do and as much as I can do," the president told me as we walked along Kotzebue Bay.This approach of being strategic about change has often been the source of tension between President Obama and many on the left. He addresses some of those particulars during this interview: the stimulus was too small, Obamacare instead of single payer, the failure of cap and trade. I am sure that before the ink has dried on any deal negotiated in Paris, we'll be hearing the same thing...it's not enough.
I am often reminded of a conversation Pete Seeger had with Majora Carter about the pace of change. Here's what Seeger said about why Martin Luther King, Jr. started with a bus boycott in Montgomery, Alabama.
Why did he start with a bus boycott? Why didn't he start with something like schools, or jobs, or voting? Couldn't a bus boycott come later?That's a perfect example of how "hope builds on itself" and "success breeds success." The only other ingredients that are necessary are patience and a sustained commitment.
When you face an opponent over a broad front, you don't aim at the opponent's strong points. You aim for something a little off to the side. But you win it. And having won that bus boycott...13 months it took him to do it...then he moved on to other things.
About single payer ... we both know the numbers simply weren't there in Congress, and what's more, single payer in Vermont failed because medical costs were too high, which suggests that a national program might well have met with similar failure. But Bernie and Hillary have both recently introduced bills to take some whacks at out-of-control pharmaceutical costs, for example allowing imported drugs and allocating more funds to the FDA to allow approval of more generic drugs. That's another example of chipping away at a problem a little at a time ... and I'm glad Bernie's starting to show just enough signs of pragmatism to recognize that single payer won't solve everything, and we need to take the fight where success is possible.ReplyDelete
Bernie also introduced a bill to outlaw for-profit prisons, which I agree with, but of course without a Congress willing to even vote on it it's just an empty gesture. So Bernie still disappoints.
That said, Bernie ought to try a little chess himself, with bills that could never clear Congress today. Step 1: draft a number of useful bills that would be no-brainers for a Democratically-controlled Congress. Step 2: campaign on how those bills are being held hostage by Republicans, waiting to become law, and all that's required is for his supporters to dominate on Election Day and take back both chambers (some filibuster reform required). Step 3: get Hillary to pledge that, if she becomes President and those bills pass her desk, she will sign them into law.